Pasar al contenido principal

A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. Int J Spine Surg

Investigación y educación

Enviado por remote_content el
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. Int J Spine Surg
Investigación y Educación web_5

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to provide reference set of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) effect size data for back and leg pain following endoscopic and IPS decompression for lumbar herniated disc, foraminal, or lateral recess spinal stenosis.

Conclusion: Lumbar IPS implantation produces larger reduction in low back pain than spinal endoscopy. On the basis of this meta-analysis, the combination of lumbar transforaminal endoscopy with simultaneous IPS has merits and should be formally investigated in higher grade clinical studies.

Read full article

Artículos que te pueden interesar

Medicina Interna

Herramientas para identificar consumo y desperdicio de la dieta hospitalaria. Revisión Sistemática. Rev. chil. nutr.vol.49 no.2 Santiago

Abril 1, 2022

Leer más

Neurología

"Frequency of NMOSD misdiagnosis in a cohort from Latin America: Impact and evaluation of different contributors. Mult Scler. 2022 Dec"

Diciembre 1, 2022

Leer más

Medicina Crítica

Multinational prospective cohort study over 24 years of the risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in 187 ICUs in 12 Latin American countries

Diciembre 29, 2022

Leer más